quiet-knives:

PSA: because I keep seeing that shitty manipulated photo of Emma Watson on my dash. THAT PHOTO WAS PHOTOSHOPPED.  The original photo (with another from the same shoot, is from 2011 with Mariano Vivanco) are pictured above. Please don’t perpetuate this error. 

Deliberately spreading an altered image of Emma Watson which purports to show her breasts as a statement against threats of nude photo leaks is the height of hypocrisy and whoever did it should be ashamed. (x)

I had reblogged the fake one because I didn’t do any background research, so here’s the truth to hopefully fix any non-truths I accidentally spread. :)

(via chairsareuseful)

ravensrandoms:

drziggystardust:

skeptikhaleesi:

Some interesting info: This is very reminiscent of the Baby X experiments, in which it was discovered that people reacted differently to a baby’s behavior depending on whether or not they believed the baby to be male or female.  People were asked to watch a video of a baby reacting to a startling image (a Jack-in-the-box popping up), and describe the baby’s emotional state.  When people believed the baby to be female, they described the baby as being scared and upset; when they thought the baby was male, they perceived the baby to be angry.  This was very telling, as it showed that literally identical behavior could be construed differently based on the perceived gender of the subject.

Now imagine a lifetime of gender specific socialization- male anger is par for the course while the same emotion in a woman is personal weakness. Ha oh sorry don’t have to imagine THAT’S REALITY 

Yes.

ravensrandoms:

drziggystardust:

skeptikhaleesi:

Some interesting info: This is very reminiscent of the Baby X experiments, in which it was discovered that people reacted differently to a baby’s behavior depending on whether or not they believed the baby to be male or female.  People were asked to watch a video of a baby reacting to a startling image (a Jack-in-the-box popping up), and describe the baby’s emotional state.  When people believed the baby to be female, they described the baby as being scared and upset; when they thought the baby was male, they perceived the baby to be angry.  This was very telling, as it showed that literally identical behavior could be construed differently based on the perceived gender of the subject.

Now imagine a lifetime of gender specific socialization- male anger is par for the course while the same emotion in a woman is personal weakness. Ha oh sorry don’t have to imagine THAT’S REALITY 

Yes.

(Source: queergraffiti, via tomthemonkey)

jewnasty:

remi-moose:

xmissxsyx:

Westboro Church’s Neighbors: The Equality House

UGH MY HEART! I KNEW IT WAS RAINBOW BUT I DIDN’T KNOW THEY PAINTED THE OTHER SIDE THE TRANS COLORS. MY FEELS. 

This is like that house that catches all the runaway gays in But I’m a Cheerleader

jewnasty:

remi-moose:

xmissxsyx:

Westboro Church’s Neighbors: The Equality House

UGH MY HEART! I KNEW IT WAS RAINBOW BUT I DIDN’T KNOW THEY PAINTED THE OTHER SIDE THE TRANS COLORS. MY FEELS. 

This is like that house that catches all the runaway gays in But I’m a Cheerleader

(via tomthemonkey)